Matthew Garrett <mj...@srcf.ucam.org> writes: > On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 07:05:15PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote: > >> I'd prefer we avoided mixing them up. Everyone seems fairly happy with >> the current operator ordered suspend behaviour I believe ? > > No. The current mechanism can lose wakeup events.
And the proposed solution (suspend blockers) does nothing to solve the loss of wakeup events during forced suspend. Kevin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
