On Tuesday 01 June 2010 09:38:07 ext Jarkko Nikula wrote:
> On Mon, 31 May 2010 14:57:22 +0300
> 
> Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfal...@nokia.com> wrote:
> > On Monday 31 May 2010 13:00:21 ext Liam Girdwood wrote:
> > 
> > ...
> > 
> > > > +static int hw_rule_bsize_by_channels(struct snd_pcm_hw_params
> > > > *params, +                                  struct snd_pcm_hw_rule 
> > > > *rule)
> > > > +{
> > > > +       struct snd_interval *bs = hw_param_interval(params,
> > > > +                                       SNDRV_PCM_HW_PARAM_BUFFER_SIZE);
> > > > +       struct snd_interval *c = hw_param_interval(params,
> > > > +                                       SNDRV_PCM_HW_PARAM_CHANNELS);
> > > 
> > > Best to make these variable names more meaningful.
> > 
> > Sure, I can change that. I have picked these, since all code, which adds
> > hw_rule (and the writing an ALSA driver manual) are using variables like
> > this. In Here I mean:
> > bs == Buffer Size
> > c == Channels
> 
> Change also function names. They should start with omap_mcbsp_.
> 
> hw_rule_bsize_by_channels
> hw_rule_psize_by_channels
> ->
> omap_mcbsp_(calc_max_bufsize, rule_max_buf, or something)
> omap_mcbsp_(calc_max_periodsize)

Oh yes, they should start with omap_mcbsp_
I'll change them too.

I like the following naming:
omap_mcbsp_hwrule_min_buffersize()
omap_mcbsp_hwrule_max_periodsize()

Also, I think there is no point to limit the lower period size in threshold 
mode 
to 32, so I will remove that as well I think.

I'll wait couple of hours for comments, and resend the series.

Thanks,
Péter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to