> > >>   I think Ajay has explained why it's needed. The option is
> > >>necessary in one or another form.
> >
> > >It's not needed for omaps, we can already build in support for
> > >omap2, omap3 and omap4 into the same kernel binary.
> >
> >    Not with AM35x USB support merged -- at least you won't be able
> > to build single kernel with monolithic MUSB support.
> 
> Right. I believe musb is pretty much the only remaining driver
> that won't behave with multi-omap. But let's not merge code that
> would make fixing that even harder.
> 
> > >If a Kconfig option is needed for optionally compiling in the support
> > >for am35x musb, it should be called USB_MUSB_AM35X or similar that
> > >gets selected if the boards using it are selected.
> >
> >    Do you mean that we should have this option in
> drivers/usb/musb/Kconfig?
> 
> Yeah, it could be set automatically with default y if
> MACH_AM35X_SOME_BOARD.
> 
> Then options like this should not be mutually exclusive like they
> currently are for musb, that breaks using musb with multi omap.

Choosing USB_MUSB_AM35X would anyways compile am35x.c and not omap2430.c
File; thus musb would not work on OMAP3x boards with same binary.

I will update the patches and submit for further reviews.

Thanks,
Ajay
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Tony
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to