Mis-typed omap's list; sorry for the resend

On 08/03/2010 04:35 PM, Patrick Pannuto wrote:
> Inspiration for this comes from:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-omap@vger.kernel.org/msg31161.html
> 
> INTRO
> 
> As SOCs become more popular, the desire to quickly define a simple,
> but functional, bus type with only a few unique properties becomes
> desirable. As they become more complicated, the ability to nest these
> simple busses and otherwise orchestrate them to match the actual
> topology also becomes desirable.
> 
> EXAMPLE USAGE
> 
> /arch/ARCH/MY_ARCH/my_bus.c:
> 
>       #include <linux/device.h>
>       #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> 
>       struct bus_type my_bus_type = {
>               .name   = "mybus",
>       };
>       EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(my_bus_type);
> 
>       struct platform_device sub_bus1 = {
>               .name           = "sub_bus1",
>               .id             = -1,
>               .dev.bus        = &my_bus_type,
>       }
>       EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sub_bus1);
> 
>       struct platform_device sub_bus2 = {
>               .name           = "sub_bus2",
>               .id             = -1,
>               .dev.bus        = &my_bus_type,
>       }
>       EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sub_bus2);
> 
>       static int __init my_bus_init(void)
>       {
>               int error;
>               platform_bus_type_init(&my_bus_type);
> 
>               error = bus_register(&my_bus_type);
>               if (error)
>                       return error;
> 
>               error = platform_device_register(&sub_bus1);
>               if (error)
>                       goto fail_sub_bus1;
> 
>               error = platform_device_register(&sub_bus2);
>               if (error)
>                       goto fail_sub_bus2;
> 
>               return error;
> 
>       fail_sub_bus2:
>               platform_device_unregister(&sub_bus1);
>       fail_sub_bus2:
>               bus_unregister(&my_bus_type);
> 
>               return error;
>       }
>       postcore_initcall(my_bus_init);
>       EXPORT_SYMBOL_CPY(my_bus_init);
> 
> /drivers/my_driver.c
>       static struct platform_driver my_driver = {
>               .driver = {
>                       .name   = "my-driver",
>                       .owner  = THIS_MODULE,
>                       .bus    = &my_bus_type,
>               },
>       };
> 
> /somewhere/my_device.c
>       static struct platform_device my_device = {
>               .name           = "my-device",
>               .id             = -1,
>               .dev.bus        = &my_bus_type,
>               .dev.parent     = &sub_bus_1.dev,
>       };
> 
> Notice that for a device / driver, only 3 lines were added to
> switch from the platform bus to the new my_bus. This is
> especially valuable if we consider supporting a legacy SOCs
> and new SOCs where the same driver is used, but may need to
> be on either the platform bus or the new my_bus. The above
> code then becomes:
> 
>       (possibly in a header)
>       #ifdef CONFIG_MY_BUS
>       #define MY_BUS_TYPE     &my_bus_type
>       #else
>       #define MY_BUS_TYPE     NULL
>       #endif
> 
> /drivers/my_driver.c
>       static struct platform_driver my_driver = {
>               .driver = {
>                       .name   = "my-driver",
>                       .owner  = THIS_MODULE,
>                       .bus    = MY_BUS_TYPE,
>               },
>       };
> 
> Which will allow the same driver to easily to used on either
> the platform bus or the newly defined bus type.
> 
> This will build a device tree that mirrors the actual configuration:
>     /sys/bus
>     |-- my_bus
>     |   |-- devices
>     |   |   |-- sub_bus1 -> ../../../devices/platform/sub_bus1
>     |   |   |-- sub_bus2 -> ../../../devices/platform/sub_bus2
>     |   |   |-- my-device -> ../../../devices/platform/sub_bus1/my-device
>     |   |-- drivers
>     |   |   |-- my-driver
> 
> I believe this to be a fairly elegant and simple solution to the
> problem, but humbly RFC
> 
> -Pat
> 
> Signed-off-by: Patrick Pannuto <ppann...@codeaurora.org>
> ---
>  drivers/base/platform.c         |   30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>  include/linux/platform_device.h |    2 ++
>  2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/base/platform.c b/drivers/base/platform.c
> index 4d99c8b..c86be03 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/platform.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/platform.c
> @@ -241,7 +241,8 @@ int platform_device_add(struct platform_device *pdev)
>       if (!pdev->dev.parent)
>               pdev->dev.parent = &platform_bus;
>  
> -     pdev->dev.bus = &platform_bus_type;
> +     if (!pdev->dev.bus)
> +             pdev->dev.bus = &platform_bus_type;
>  
>       if (pdev->id != -1)
>               dev_set_name(&pdev->dev, "%s.%d", pdev->name,  pdev->id);
> @@ -482,7 +483,8 @@ static void platform_drv_shutdown(struct device *_dev)
>   */
>  int platform_driver_register(struct platform_driver *drv)
>  {
> -     drv->driver.bus = &platform_bus_type;
> +     if (!drv->driver.bus)
> +             drv->driver.bus = &platform_bus_type;
>       if (drv->probe)
>               drv->driver.probe = platform_drv_probe;
>       if (drv->remove)
> @@ -539,12 +541,12 @@ int __init_or_module platform_driver_probe(struct 
> platform_driver *drv,
>        * if the probe was successful, and make sure any forced probes of
>        * new devices fail.
>        */
> -     spin_lock(&platform_bus_type.p->klist_drivers.k_lock);
> +     spin_lock(&drv->driver.bus->p->klist_drivers.k_lock);
>       drv->probe = NULL;
>       if (code == 0 && list_empty(&drv->driver.p->klist_devices.k_list))
>               retval = -ENODEV;
>       drv->driver.probe = platform_drv_probe_fail;
> -     spin_unlock(&platform_bus_type.p->klist_drivers.k_lock);
> +     spin_unlock(&drv->driver.bus->p->klist_drivers.k_lock);
>  
>       if (code != retval)
>               platform_driver_unregister(drv);
> @@ -1017,6 +1019,26 @@ struct bus_type platform_bus_type = {
>  };
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(platform_bus_type);
>  
> +/** platform_bus_type_init - fill in a pseudo-platform-bus
> +  * @bus: foriegn bus type
> +  *
> +  * This init is basically a selective memcpy that
> +  * won't overwrite any user-defined attributes and
> +  * only copies things that platform bus defines anyway
> +  */
> +void platform_bus_type_init(struct bus_type *bus)
> +{
> +     if (!bus->dev_attrs)
> +             bus->dev_attrs = platform_bus_type.dev_attrs;
> +     if (!bus->match)
> +             bus->match = platform_bus_type.match;
> +     if (!bus->uevent)
> +             bus->uevent = platform_bus_type.uevent;
> +     if (!bus->pm)
> +             bus->pm = platform_bus_type.pm;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(platform_bus_type_init);
> +
>  int __init platform_bus_init(void)
>  {
>       int error;
> diff --git a/include/linux/platform_device.h b/include/linux/platform_device.h
> index 5417944..fa8c35a 100644
> --- a/include/linux/platform_device.h
> +++ b/include/linux/platform_device.h
> @@ -79,6 +79,8 @@ extern int platform_driver_probe(struct platform_driver 
> *driver,
>  #define platform_get_drvdata(_dev)   dev_get_drvdata(&(_dev)->dev)
>  #define platform_set_drvdata(_dev,data)      dev_set_drvdata(&(_dev)->dev, 
> (data))
>  
> +extern void platform_bus_type_init(struct bus_type *);
> +
>  extern struct platform_device *platform_create_bundle(struct platform_driver 
> *driver,
>                                       int (*probe)(struct platform_device *),
>                                       struct resource *res, unsigned int 
> n_res,


-- 
Employee of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to