Hi Ohad,

This patch already contains the missed changes due to previous rebases.
Thanks.

Regards,
Rene

> -----Original Message-----
> From: linux-omap-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-omap-
> ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Guzman Lugo, Fernando
> Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2010 8:13 PM
> To: linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org; linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: hiroshi.d...@nokia.com; o...@wizery.com; Guzman Lugo, Fernando
> Subject: [PATCHv2] mailbox: change full flag per mailbox queue instead of
> global
> 
> As pointed by Ohad Ben-Cohen, the variable rq_full flag is a
> global variable, so if there are multiple mailbox users
> there will be conflics. Now there is a full flag per
> mailbox queue.
> 
> Version 2:
> - Rebase to the latest.
> 
> Reported-by: Ohad Ben-Cohen <o...@wizery.com>
> Signed-off-by: Fernando Guzman Lugo <x0095...@ti.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/mailbox.h |    1 +
>  arch/arm/plat-omap/mailbox.c              |   10 +++++++---
>  2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/mailbox.h b/arch/arm/plat-
> omap/include/plat/mailbox.h
> index 9976565..261f6b8 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/mailbox.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/mailbox.h
> @@ -48,6 +48,7 @@ struct omap_mbox_queue {
>       struct tasklet_struct   tasklet;
>       int     (*callback)(void *);
>       struct omap_mbox        *mbox;
> +     bool    full;
>  };
> 
>  struct omap_mbox {
> diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-omap/mailbox.c b/arch/arm/plat-omap/mailbox.c
> index d2fafb8..c59c9c3 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/plat-omap/mailbox.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/mailbox.c
> @@ -33,7 +33,6 @@
> 
>  static struct workqueue_struct *mboxd;
>  static struct omap_mbox **mboxes;
> -static bool rq_full;
> 
>  static int mbox_configured;
>  static DEFINE_MUTEX(mbox_configured_lock);
> @@ -145,7 +144,12 @@ static void mbox_rx_work(struct work_struct *work)
>       while (kfifo_len(&mq->fifo) >= sizeof(msg)) {
>               len = kfifo_out(&mq->fifo, (unsigned char *)&msg,
> sizeof(msg));
>               WARN_ON(len != sizeof(msg));
> -
> +             spin_lock_irq(&mq->lock);
> +             if (mq->full) {
> +                     omap_mbox_enable_irq(mq->mbox, IRQ_RX);
> +                     mq->full = false;
> +             }
> +             spin_unlock_irq(&mq->lock);
>               if (mq->callback)
>                       mq->callback((void *)msg);
>       }
> @@ -170,7 +174,7 @@ static void __mbox_rx_interrupt(struct omap_mbox
> *mbox)
>       while (!mbox_fifo_empty(mbox)) {
>               if (unlikely(kfifo_avail(&mq->fifo) < sizeof(msg))) {
>                       omap_mbox_disable_irq(mbox, IRQ_RX);
> -                     rq_full = true;
> +                     mq->full = true;
>                       goto nomem;
>               }
> 
> --
> 1.6.3.3
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
> the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to