On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 07:59:16AM +0200, ext Gadiyar, Anand wrote:
Felipe Balbi wrote:
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 01:49:36AM +0200, ext Keshava Munegowda wrote:
>@@ -126,6 +126,14 @@ config USB_EHCI_MXC
> ---help---
> Variation of ARC USB block used in some Freescale chips.
>
>+config USB_EHCI_HCD_OMAP3
>+ bool "EHCI support for OMAP3 and later chips"
>+ depends on USB_EHCI_HCD && (ARCH_OMAP3 || ARCH_OMAP4)
this line doesn't scale. When we have another omap release this will
become e.g. ARCH_OMAP3 || ARCH_OMAP4 || ARCH_OMAP5 || ARCH_OMAP6 etc
etc, so instead of depending on ARCH_OMAPX, depend only on ARCH_OMAP and
make the architecture select the USB_ARCH_HAS_EHCI like this:
ARCH_OMAP includes OMAP1/2, and these chips do not have any EHCI controllers.
Is this okay?
as long as noone selects USB_ARCH_HAS_EHCI for omap1/2 it's fine.
--
balbi
DefectiveByDesign.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
