Pramod, Teerth, On Thu, 1 Jul 2010, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> Pramod, Teerth, > > On Mon, 7 Jun 2010, Gurav , Pramod wrote: > > > Can you please push these patches if you don't you are OK with them? > > As we discussed in Bangalore, these patches need some changes: > > 1. The delay needs to be precisely characterized in terms of what the > hardware actually needs. It should not be necessary to add any extra > timing slop, due to unknown sources, in the code. Unknown sources of > delay can cause problems if, for example, a customer changes some board > characteristics (such as sys_clk frequency, or DPLL multipliers/dividers) > that the delay depends on. > > Also, my understanding is that RX-51 shipped without unknown timing > factors in this code. Please work with the hardware people to precisely > characterize the delay, assuming that it does not match what is documented > in the TRM. > > 2. Please split out the individual components of the delay calculation to > the code that handles those clocks. For example, HSDIVIDER change delay > should be calculated by code that handles the HSDIVIDER. DPLL relock > delay should be calculated by code in the dpll*.c files. etc. Any updates on these patches? - Paul -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
