On 10/26/2010 8:32 AM, Pierre Tardy wrote:
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 2:10 AM, Ingo Molnar<mi...@elte.hu> wrote:
How will future PCI (or other device) power saving tracepoints be called?
Might be more consistent to use:
power:cpu_idle
power:machine_idle
power:device_idle
Agree with this.
FYI, I have a runtime_pm tracepoint currently cooking. Here is
preliminary patch.
Can this be a candidate for a "power:device_idle" tracepoint?
I would like to see a slightly more advanced tracepoint do the runtime
pm framework;
specifically I'd like to see the "comm" of the process that's taking a
refcount on a device
(that way, powertop can track which process keeps a device busy)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
