* Kevin Hilman <khil...@deeprootsystems.com> [101116 08:06]:
> Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazz...@free-electrons.com> writes:
> 
> > On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 09:23:06 -0600
> > Nishanth Menon <n...@ti.com> wrote:
> >
> >> my initial implementation had forced board files to call the 
> >> opp_init_table, then changed that here:
> >> http://marc.info/?l=linux-omap&m=127431810922704&w=2
> >> Kevin seemed happy with the change here:
> >> http://marc.info/?l=linux-omap&m=127507237109393&w=2
> >
> > Ok, if Kevin is happy with this solution, fair enough. Sorry for the
> > noise, and thanks for your answers.
> 
> Yes, I'm not a big fan of the init function called multiple times
> either, but I really want to minimize what board files have to do.
> 
> Historically, we tend to add all the init functions to every board file,
> and this is getting cumbersome to understand and maintain.  What we need
> is for common code to take care of sensible defaults for all boards, and
> then only boards with non-default behavior have to have custom code.

Yeah. The initial comment from Thomas with data in .h file should
be fixed though.

Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to