On Thu, 9 Dec 2010 14:41:50 +0100
Janusz Krzysztofik <jkrzy...@tis.icnet.pl> wrote:

> This patch extends the LED backlight tirgger driver with an option that 
> allows 
> for inverting the trigger output polarity.
> 
> With the invertion option provided, I (ab)use the backlight trigger for 
> driving a LED that indicates LCD display blank condtition on my Amstrad Delta 
> videophone. Since the machine has no dedicated power LED, it was not possible 
> to distinguish if the display was blanked, or the machine was turned off, 
> without touching it.
> 
> The invert sysfs control is patterned after a similiar function of the GPIO 
> trigger driver.
> 
> Created and tested against linux-2.6.36-rc5 on Amstrad Delta.
> Retested on linux-2.6.37-rc4.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Janusz Krzysztofik <jkrzy...@tis.icnet.pl>
> Cc: Richard Purdie <rpur...@rpsys.net>
> ---
> 
> Resent because I still can't see any response received, while yet another 
> merge window is going to pass away soon.
> 
> Applies cleanly on top of 2.6.37-rc4, so no need for yet another refresh. 
> Only 
> tried to clean up the commit message slightly - maybe my English is not good 
> enough to bother with, if not the code?
> 
> v1 -> v2 changes:
> - improve some conditional expressions to be more readable; thanks to Ralph 
>   Corderoy (from e3-hacking) and Lars-Peter Clausen for their suggestions,
> - refresh against linux-2.6.36-rc5.
> 
>  drivers/leds/ledtrig-backlight.c |   60 
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 56 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff -upr linux-2.6.36-rc5.orig/drivers/leds/ledtrig-backlight.c 
> linux-2.6.36-rc5/drivers/leds/ledtrig-backlight.c
> --- linux-2.6.36-rc5.orig/drivers/leds/ledtrig-backlight.c    2010-09-24 
> 15:35:13.000000000 +0200
> +++ linux-2.6.36-rc5/drivers/leds/ledtrig-backlight.c 2010-10-03 
> 15:59:49.000000000 +0200
> @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ struct bl_trig_notifier {
>       int brightness;
>       int old_status;
>       struct notifier_block notifier;
> +     unsigned invert;
>  };
>  
>  static int fb_notifier_callback(struct notifier_block *p,
> @@ -36,23 +37,63 @@ static int fb_notifier_callback(struct n
>       struct led_classdev *led = n->led;
>       struct fb_event *fb_event = data;
>       int *blank = fb_event->data;
> +     int new_status = *blank ? BLANK : UNBLANK;
>  
>       switch (event) {
>       case FB_EVENT_BLANK :
> -             if (*blank && n->old_status == UNBLANK) {
> +             if (new_status == n->old_status)
> +                     break;
> +
> +             if ((n->old_status == UNBLANK) ^ n->invert) {
>                       n->brightness = led->brightness;
>                       led_set_brightness(led, LED_OFF);
> -                     n->old_status = BLANK;
> -             } else if (!*blank && n->old_status == BLANK) {
> +             } else {
>                       led_set_brightness(led, n->brightness);
> -                     n->old_status = UNBLANK;
>               }
> +
> +             n->old_status = new_status;
> +
>               break;
>       }
>  
>       return 0;
>  }
>  
> +static ssize_t bl_trig_invert_show(struct device *dev,
> +             struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
> +{
> +     struct led_classdev *led = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> +     struct bl_trig_notifier *n = led->trigger_data;
> +
> +     return sprintf(buf, "%s\n", n->invert ? "yes" : "no");
> +}

I think this should show "0" or "1", to match the thing which the user
wrote here.

> +static ssize_t bl_trig_invert_store(struct device *dev,
> +             struct device_attribute *attr, const char *buf, size_t num)
> +{
> +     struct led_classdev *led = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> +     struct bl_trig_notifier *n = led->trigger_data;
> +     unsigned invert;
> +     int ret;
> +
> +     ret = sscanf(buf, "%u", &invert);

Here we should use strict_strtoul() so the kernel correctly rejects
input of the form "42foo".

> +     if (ret < 1) {
> +             dev_err(dev, "invalid value\n");
> +             return -EINVAL;
> +     }

And here it would be better to disallow any input other than 0 or 1. 
Because "2" makes no sense and who knows, some time in the future we
might *want* to permit 2.

So...

--- 
a/drivers/leds/ledtrig-backlight.c~leds-add-output-inversion-option-to-backlight-trigger-fix
+++ a/drivers/leds/ledtrig-backlight.c
@@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ static ssize_t bl_trig_invert_show(struc
        struct led_classdev *led = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
        struct bl_trig_notifier *n = led->trigger_data;
 
-       return sprintf(buf, "%s\n", n->invert ? "yes" : "no");
+       return sprintf(buf, "%u\n", n->invert);
 }
 
 static ssize_t bl_trig_invert_store(struct device *dev,
@@ -73,16 +73,17 @@ static ssize_t bl_trig_invert_store(stru
 {
        struct led_classdev *led = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
        struct bl_trig_notifier *n = led->trigger_data;
-       unsigned invert;
+       unsigned long invert;
        int ret;
 
-       ret = sscanf(buf, "%u", &invert);
-       if (ret < 1) {
-               dev_err(dev, "invalid value\n");
+       ret = strict_strtoul(buf, 10, &invert);
+       if (ret < 0)
+               return ret;
+
+       if (invert > 1)
                return -EINVAL;
-       }
 
-       n->invert = !!invert;
+       n->invert = invert;
 
        /* After inverting, we need to update the LED. */
        if ((n->old_status == BLANK) ^ n->invert)
_


Could you help test it please?

> +static DEVICE_ATTR(invert, 0644, bl_trig_invert_show, bl_trig_invert_store);

This new sysfs file should be documented.  Where would be an
appropriate place for that?  Documentation/leds-class.txt doesn't
mention a sysfs API at all.  
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to