On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 10:12:38AM +0200, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote: > On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 9:40 AM, Andrew Morton <a...@linux-foundation.org> > wrote: > > On Tue, 1 Feb 2011 09:36:22 +0200 Ohad Ben-Cohen <o...@wizery.com> wrote: > > > >> On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 8:38 AM, Andrew Morton <a...@linux-foundation.org> > >> wrote: > >> >> I'll do a quick respin of the patches with that and the > >> >> hwspinlock_internal.h comment above. > >> > > >> > OK.. > >> > > >> > The patch series looks OK to me. > >> > >> Can I add your Acked-by on the non-omap parts when I respin the series ? > > > > spose so. I don't normally do acked-by's. I think it's my way of > > avoiding getting blamed when it all blows up. > > I don't want to be breaking old habits then :) > > >> > Maybe Tony or Russell or Greg can grab them > >> > if they like the look of it all? > > Let's just wait a bit for Tony's or Russell's or Greg's answer.
As it touches OMAP code, it makes sense to merge it through Tony's tree as that should reduce the number of possible conflicts. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
