* Ramirez Luna, Omar <omar.rami...@ti.com> [110215 16:11]: > > > If you have to do several platform_get_irq_byname to get this one, I'd > > prefer to get rid of that name for OMAP4. It will make mailbox irq > > consistent with the other hwmods. > > I was thinking to standardize the names to be mbox0..mboxN across all > the platforms, reason being that the mailbox also has capabilities to > be used not only by dsp or iva, by using a polling method. > > So even if the mailbox in OMAP3 is called "dsp", it has 4 more queues > apart from the 2 used for messaging between arm and dsp, that could be > used even if tidspbridge wasn't there.
So what's the status of this series? Can the rest of the patches now be applied on top of the current omap-for-linus or do the names still need fixing? Tony -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
