Hi Felipe,
On 03/31/2011 06:44 PM, ext Felipe Balbi wrote:
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 06:30:32PM +0300, Ameya Palande wrote:
Hi Felipe,
On 03/31/2011 05:26 PM, ext Felipe Balbi wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 04:38:12PM +0300, Ameya Palande wrote:
+static int rx51_lp5523_setup(void)
+{
+ int err;
+
+ err = gpio_request_one(RX51_LP5523_CHIP_EN_GPIO, GPIOF_DIR_OUT,
+ "lp5523_enable");
+ if (err< 0) {
+ pr_err("Unable to get lp5523_enable GPIO\n");
+ return err;
+ }
+
+ return err;
isn't enough to return gpio_request_one(RX51_LP5523_CHIP_EN_GPIO,
GPIOF_DIR_OUT, "lp5523_enable"); ??
But then we won't know the failure reason for lp5523_probe()
I would prefer printing an error!
see that both gpio_request() and gpio_direction_output() have debugging
prints for error cases ;-)
Agreed :) Thanks for the review!
Will send v3.
Cheers,
Ameya.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
