On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 04:18:23PM +0000, Nguyen Dinh-R00091 wrote: > >Hmm, that's nice - except for one issue. According to my grep of > >arch/arm/ and drivers/, nothing uses iram_alloc(). So, does anything in > >the MX stuff use iram_alloc.c, or is it dead code left over from a > >previous experiment? > > This function will be used for suspend code in the mx5x series. I just > got done submitting a series of patches to Sascha for a simple suspend > that does not need running code out of IRAM yet. The next set of suspend > patches will be using these iram functions.
Okay, so does iram_alloc() need to return a dma_addr_t or a phys_addr_t ? Are you dealing with physical addresses for it or DMA addresses? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
