On 14:22-20110526, Premi, Sanjeev wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: linux-omap-ow...@vger.kernel.org
> > [mailto:linux-omap-ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Menon, Nishanth
> > Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2011 7:27 AM
> > To: linux-omap
> > Cc: Nayak, Rajendra
> > Subject: [RFC][PATCH 7/9] OMAP4: powerdomain: Update MPU
> > powerdomain for 4460
> >
> > From: Rajendra Nayak <rna...@ti.com>
> >
> > The 4460 platform has changes in the MPU powerdomain,
> > hence model a new powerdomain for it and identify
> > is using the CHIP_IS_OMAP446X macro.
> > Also move all the common powerdomains to use
> > CHIP_IS_44XX so they are reused on OMAP4460.
> >
> [snip]...[snip]
>
> > +static struct powerdomain mpu_446x_pwrdm = {
> > + .name = "mpu_pwrdm",
> > + .prcm_offs = OMAP4430_PRM_MPU_INST,
> > + .prcm_partition = OMAP4430_PRM_PARTITION,
> > + .omap_chip = OMAP_CHIP_INIT(CHIP_IS_OMAP4460),
>
> [sp] This change doesn't go with the description above.
> Shouldn't this be CHIP_IS_OMAP44XX or CHIP_IS_OMAP446X
> to be more future safe?
hmm.. similar to Vikram's comment as well. Will switch to using 6X
and 3X instead of 60 and 30 if there are no contrary opinions.
--
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
