On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 04:05:42PM +0530, Sanjeev Premi wrote:
> Currently, loops_per_jiffy is being calculated before calling
> cpufreq_notify_transition().
> 
> However, generic cpufreq driver adjusts the jiffies as well.
> Double adjustment leads to incorrect value being assigned to
> loops_per_jiffy.

Are you sure the generic cpufreq driver adjusts the per-cpu loops_per_jiffy
values?  I don't believe it does.

> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap2plus-cpufreq.c 
> b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap2plus-cpufreq.c
> index ce9d534..346519e 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap2plus-cpufreq.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap2plus-cpufreq.c
> @@ -114,29 +114,13 @@ static int omap_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
>  
>       freqs.new = omap_getspeed(policy->cpu);
>  
> -     /*
> -      * In the generic cpufreq driver jiffies are updated only for
> -      * non-SMP cases. Ensure that jiffies are bing updated for both
> -      * SMP systems and UP systems built with CONFIG_SMP enabled.
> -      */
> +     /* Notify transitions */
>       if (is_smp()) {
> -#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> -             for_each_cpu(i, policy->cpus)
> -                     per_cpu(cpu_data, i).loops_per_jiffy =
> -                             cpufreq_scale(per_cpu(cpu_data, 
> i).loops_per_jiffy,
> -                                             freqs.old,
> -                                             freqs.new);
> -#endif
> -             /* Notify transitions */

So this is a NAK.  What's also missing is a scaling of loops_per_jiffy
itself here, because with SMP=y the core won't do this for you.

>               for_each_cpu(i, policy->cpus) {
>                       freqs.cpu = i;
>                       cpufreq_notify_transition(&freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
>               }
>       } else {
> -             loops_per_jiffy = cpufreq_scale(loops_per_jiffy,
> -                                     freqs.old, freqs.new);
> -
> -             /* Notify transitions */

This is almost right - the core cpufreq code looks after this when
CONFIG_SMP is not selected.  However, if you're running a kernel built
for SMP on UP, then loops_per_jiffy won't be scaled, so something
needs to be done to cover that case.

Note also that you should scale the loops_per_jiffy against a reference
value, otherwise you'll get an increasing error each time you scale.

So, if we want to do this then we need to store the boot-time lpj and
frequency as the baseline reference, and scale according to that,
much like the core cpufreq code does for loops_per_jiffy for the !SMP
case.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to