Hi,
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 05:41:02AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Felipe Balbi <ba...@ti.com> [110810 05:31]:
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 05:55:20PM +0530, Keerthy wrote:
> > > +
> > > +int __init omap_devinit_temp_sensor(void)
> > > +{
> > > + if (!cpu_is_omap446x())
> > > + return 0;
> > > +
> > > + return omap_hwmod_for_each_by_class("temperature_sensor",
> > > + temp_sensor_dev_init, NULL);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +arch_initcall(omap_devinit_temp_sensor);
> >
> > I really dislike people adding more and more *initcall() to their pieces
> > of code. But Tony is the final Judge.
>
> Yes how about making this just a regular device driver and have it
> live under drivers/ somewhere?
>
> Or is there some reason why this could not be a loadable module?driver is loadable, this is just creating the platform_device, but still I don't think it deserves its own arch_initcall(), it could very well be something which is called after we know we're running at omap4, or called by each board... -- balbi
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
