On Saturday, August 13, 2011, mark gross wrote: > On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 05:06:41PM +0200, jean.pi...@newoldbits.com wrote: > > From: Jean Pihet <j-pi...@ti.com> > > > > In preparation for the per-device constratins support, re-organize > > the data strctures: > > - add a struct pm_qos_constraints which contains the constraints > > related data > > - update struct pm_qos_object contents to the PM QoS internal object > > data. Add a pointer to struct pm_qos_constraints > > - update the internal code to use the new data structs. > > > > Signed-off-by: Jean Pihet <j-pi...@ti.com> > > --- > > include/linux/pm_qos.h | 19 ++++++++++ > > kernel/power/qos.c | 90 > > ++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------- > > 2 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/include/linux/pm_qos.h b/include/linux/pm_qos.h > > index 6b0968f..9772311 100644 > > --- a/include/linux/pm_qos.h > > +++ b/include/linux/pm_qos.h > > @@ -25,6 +25,25 @@ struct pm_qos_request { > > int pm_qos_class; > > }; > > > > +enum pm_qos_type { > > + PM_QOS_UNITIALIZED, > what is this for?
I seem to remember discussing that previously, but I can't recall what it's for. Jean? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html