On Saturday, August 13, 2011, mark gross wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 05:06:41PM +0200, jean.pi...@newoldbits.com wrote:
> > From: Jean Pihet <j-pi...@ti.com>
> >
> > In preparation for the per-device constratins support, re-organize
> > the data strctures:
> > - add a struct pm_qos_constraints which contains the constraints
> > related data
> > - update struct pm_qos_object contents to the PM QoS internal object
> > data. Add a pointer to struct pm_qos_constraints
> > - update the internal code to use the new data structs.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jean Pihet <j-pi...@ti.com>
> > ---
> > include/linux/pm_qos.h | 19 ++++++++++
> > kernel/power/qos.c | 90
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
> > 2 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/pm_qos.h b/include/linux/pm_qos.h
> > index 6b0968f..9772311 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/pm_qos.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/pm_qos.h
> > @@ -25,6 +25,25 @@ struct pm_qos_request {
> > int pm_qos_class;
> > };
> >
> > +enum pm_qos_type {
> > + PM_QOS_UNITIALIZED,
> what is this for?
I seem to remember discussing that previously, but I can't recall what
it's for. Jean?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
