Op 22 aug. 2011, om 08:42 heeft javier Martin het volgende geschreven: > > Hi Koen, > > On 19 August 2011 17:07, Koen Kooi <k...@beagleboard.org> wrote: > > > Op 19 aug. 2011 om 14:39 heeft javier Martin > <javier.mar...@vista-silicon.com> het volgende geschreven: > >> Hi, >> I've been digging into the code of linux-omap kernel in Angstrom for >> Beagleboard and I've noticed there is an argument called "camera" which can >> be passed to the kernel. This allows telling the linux kernel what camera >> module is actually connected to the platform. >> >> However, when I look the mainline kernel 3.0 I see those changed have not >> yet made into it. Is this mechanism accepted by the community? > > When I asked a few months ago the consensus was that there currently is no > better way. DT might solve it, but that's still some time away > > So, as I understand, using a command line argument for this purpose is the > preferred way by the community but, at the same time, they won't accept > patches that implement this approach.
>From what I understood a patch doing that wouldn't be rejected, but >Laurent/Tony would have to chime in to confirm that.-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
