On Thursday 06 October 2011, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Rob Herring <robherri...@gmail.com> [111001 13:21]:
> > On 09/30/2011 05:29 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> > > Hi Arnd,
> > >
> > > Kevin Hilman <khil...@ti.com> writes:
> > >
> > >> The upcoming OMAP4 PM series from Santosh[1] that we're planning to
> > >> queue for v3.2 has a dependency[2] on a patch currently queued for v3.2
> > >> in the irq/core branch of Thomas' tip tree[3].
> > >>
> > >> In the past, I noticed you merged external trees like this to solve
> > >> dependencies.
> > >>
> > >> Could you pull the irq/core branch into your tree to meet this
> > >> dependency?
> > >
> > > On second thought, since Santosh's branch is the only one with this
> > > dependency (and we also have a dependency on Russell's devel-stable)
> > > I'll just build up a branch for Santosh's series that includes
> > > rmk/devel-stable and tglx/irq-core.
> > >
> >
> > Any new platforms will have a dependency on rmk/devel-stable with the
> > mach header clean-up. I'll probably have a dependency on tglx's tree as
> > well.
>
> Sounds like Arnd should pull this into some branch then.
I've pulled in rmk/devel-stable as a dependency now, thanks for
reminding me of that.
Thomas, where should I get the irq-core branch (or whichever
I should wait for) to pull in as another dependency. Is that
branch one that never gets rebased?
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
