Hi Tony, On 19.11.2011 04:36, Tony Lindgren wrote: >> Well, it already boots with DT actually. Did you mean booting with DT >> and board-generic? I have to admit I don't know how to proceed here: > > Good to hear you're already playing with it. Yes, let's work on making > all the boards work with DT and board-generic..
Hm, do you think it's absolutely necessary to make everybody work with board-generic? It will require a lot of additional bindings to get rid of all machine-specific code. I've just thought that on PowerPC we don't have such strict rules: if some boards are really similar they share common machine file but if we need something specific for the new board we can create it's own machine file. >> board-generic initialize twl4030 which we don't have on our board... >> Could you give me some pointer how I'm supposed to handle this? > > .. we should only initialize twl4030/twl6030 if the DT compatible flag > for it is set. But we're still missing the DT bindings for those :( > > For now, maybe try to fix the twl4030 probe so it won't do anything > unless the I2C device is found? That turned to be not such a big problem. Device is not present so we have tons of error messages but somehow it works. The bigger problem is that we have different regulator chip attached. How am I supposed to register supplies/consumers data with it? Does anybody working on DT bindings for the regulator framework? Regards, Ilya. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
