Hi Laurent,

Thanks for the review.

On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 11:24 AM, Laurent Pinchart
<laurent.pinch...@ideasonboard.com> wrote:
> Hi Sergio,
>
> On Thursday 01 December 2011 01:14:51 Sergio Aguirre wrote:
>> The define should be the result of 1 << Bit number.
>>
>> Bit number for GPOCTL.GPO3 field is 2, which results
>> in 0x4 value.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sergio Aguirre <saagui...@ti.com>
>> ---
>>  include/linux/mfd/twl6040.h |    2 +-
>>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/mfd/twl6040.h b/include/linux/mfd/twl6040.h
>> index 2463c261..2a7ff16 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/mfd/twl6040.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/mfd/twl6040.h
>> @@ -142,7 +142,7 @@
>>
>>  #define TWL6040_GPO1                 0x01
>>  #define TWL6040_GPO2                 0x02
>> -#define TWL6040_GPO3                 0x03
>> +#define TWL6040_GPO3                 0x04
>
> What about defining the fields as (1 << x) instead then ?

I thought about that, but I guess I just wanted to keep it
consistent with the rest of the file.

Maybe I can create a separate patch for changing all these bitwise
flags to use BIT() macros instead.

Thanks and Regards,
Sergio

>
>>
>>  /* ACCCTL (0x2D) fields */
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Laurent Pinchart
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to