* Péter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfal...@ti.com> [111129 04:26]: > On Thursday 10 November 2011 15:02:04 Jarkko Nikula wrote: > > On 11/10/2011 02:46 PM, Jarkko Nikula wrote: > > > On 11/07/2011 11:33 AM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote: > > > > > > I think this is enough: > > > > > > if (unlikely(p->dma_read(CDAC, lch) == 0)) > > > offset = p->dma_read(CSSA, lch); > > > > > > I suppose offset is ok for normal case as it is already read (twise) > > > above. > > Or actually my proposal could have a race if CDAC changes between CSAC > > read and CDAC read. In that case it's better to re-read CSAC as your > > patch does after CDAC test and give to both: > > > > Reviewed-by: Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nik...@bitmer.com> > > Tony, have you taken this patch? I failed to find it in the l-o tree...
Sorry for the delay, applying both into fixes-non-critical. Tony -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
