On Wed, 21 Mar 2012, Amit Kucheria wrote: > On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 12:48 AM, Kevin Hilman <khil...@ti.com> wrote: > > Maybe it's time that drivers/cpuidle gets a maintainer. With lots of > > discussions of scheduler changes that affect load estimation, I suspect > > we're all going to have a bit of CPUidle work to do in the > > not-so-distant future. > > > > I don't mean to be piling on to Len here, but Daniel Lezcano too has a > bunch of clean ups that didn't get any maintainer review for over two > months. He has now refreshed them for 3.3 and is getting ready to send > them out again. We (Linaro) expect to be spending a lot of time on > cpuidle in the future and would be glad to help review, test and > collect patches into a tree for Linus/Andrew to pull while we wait for > Len to respond or another maintainer to emerge.
As I advised recently, it is usually a good idea for the person/group who is working the most on a subsystem to simply take the lead and become the new maintainer. Waiting for another maintainer to emerge could be compared to cowardice. Nicolas
