Hi Omar, On Tue, May 01, 2012 at 23:17:38, Omar Ramirez Luna wrote: > To allow mailbox driver to function with device tree. > > Tested in OMAP4 and OMAP3. OMAP2 untested. >
I think the mailbox code needs a cleanup similar to what you had proposed earlier [1] before the device tree support is added. We probably need to decide whether the number of mailbox sub-modules should be part of hwmod attribute or come from device tree. IMO the static allocation of the mailboxes is better suited in the device-tree data. Regards, Vaibhav [1] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2011-June/054582.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
