On Tue, 2012-05-29 at 14:32 -0500, Menon, Nishanth wrote:
> On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 5:03 AM, Tero Kristo <t-kri...@ti.com> wrote:
> [...]
> > +/**
> >  * _enable - enable an omap_hwmod
> >  * @oh: struct omap_hwmod *
> >  *
> > @@ -1599,6 +1629,8 @@ static int _enable(struct omap_hwmod *oh)
> >        _enable_clocks(oh);
> >        _enable_module(oh);
> >
> > +       _omap4_update_context_lost(oh);
> > +
> >        r = _wait_target_ready(oh);
> >        if (!r) {
> >                /*
> 
> Dumb q: Since we monitor the count around _enable, how do we ensure
> that context loss counter is accurate
> around OFF and idle transitions for domains that could have been
> hwauto? it might be good to have limitations
> in the $commit_message if it is not targeted to do so.

True, I can add a comment to the commit msg about this.

-Tero

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to