On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 6:54 PM, Cousson, Benoit <b-cous...@ti.com> wrote: > On 6/1/2012 2:52 PM, ABRAHAM, KISHON VIJAY wrote: >> >> Hi Benoit, >> >> On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 8:53 PM, Cousson, Benoit<b-cous...@ti.com> wrote: >>> >>> On 5/30/2012 4:51 PM, Shilimkar, Santosh wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 4:26 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I<kis...@ti.com> >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> "ocp2scp_usb_phy_ick" clock node was a fake clock node created >>>>> to control MODULEMODE of ocp2scp. Since the hwmod for ocp2scp is now >>>>> added >>>>> (which can be used to control MODULEMODE) this clock node is removed. >>>>> >>>>> Cc: Benoit Cousson<b-cous...@ti.com> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I<kis...@ti.com> >>>>> --- >>>>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock44xx_data.c | 11 ----------- >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Have you patched clock44xx_data.c manually or you have a patch for >>>> the clock_data autogen script to generate it ? >>> >>> >>> >>> I have a series that will remove all these clock nodes. I should be able >>> to >>> post that soon. >>> >>> Potentially at that time, Kishon might be able to drop that patch. >> >> >> Will you be sending a patch for *[RFC PATCH 1/5] arm: omap: hwmod: >> make *phy_48m* as the main_clk of ocp2scp* also or I have to keep that >> as part of my series? > > > Good point. In fact, I'm fixing both at the same time to avoid any bisect > issue.
Thanks :-) -Kishon -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
