Hi Jon, On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 02:13:22, Hunter, Jon wrote:
> > + gpmc_revision = (l >> 4) & 0xf; > > Why are you only storing the major part of the rev? Why not keep both parts? Does having minor revision add any value ?, at least as of now, I do not see any. > > > + dev_info(gpmc_dev, "GPMC revision %d.%d\n", gpmc_revision, l & 0x0f); > > Nit-pick, please add a mask and shift definition for the revision > register major and minor fields and use these above. Yes, right Regards Afzal -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
