Hi Tony, On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 17:02:17, Tony Lindgren wrote: > * Mohammed, Afzal <af...@ti.com> [120612 22:00]: > > Yes, that would be better except for too much logging, if Tony > > prefers that way I will add. > > If there's a chance it causing file system corruption, we should > test it carefully on the boards before applying. If that's done, > then there's probably no need for warnings. It's safer to disable > NAND for untested boards if there's a chance of breaking the timings.
By disabling NAND, I understand that you are suggesting to remove nand initialization done in board file, right ? And boards that can be tested here are omap3evm & beagleboard, both of which can't be tested for this change. Or should additional timings be achieved without affecting old interface, but that it seems would necessitate more code duplication. Regards Afzal -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
