Couple of minor comments:
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 10:26 AM, Tero Kristo <t-kri...@ti.com> wrote:
[...]
> /**
> + * _omap4_update_context_lost - increment hwmod context loss counter if
> + * hwmod context was lost, and clear hardware context loss reg
> + * @oh: hwmod to check for context loss
> + *
> + * If the PRCM indicates that the hwmod @oh lost context, increment
> + * our in-memory context loss counter, and clear the RM_*_CONTEXT
> + * bits. No return value.
> + */
> +static void _omap4_update_context_lost(struct omap_hwmod *oh)
> +{
> + u32 r;
> +
> + if (oh->prcm.omap4.context_offs == USHRT_MAX)
> + return;
would'nt it be better to return a dummy incremental counter instead of
returning no context loss (count = 0)?
> +
> + r = omap4_prminst_read_inst_reg(oh->clkdm->pwrdm.ptr->prcm_partition,
> + oh->clkdm->pwrdm.ptr->prcm_offs,
> + oh->prcm.omap4.context_offs);
> +
> + if (!r)
> + return;
> +
> + oh->prcm.omap4.context_lost_counter++;
need to be careful about counter overflow.
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
