On Tue, 17 Jul 2012 13:57:25 +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> On Tuesday 17 July 2012 13:53:07 Jean Delvare wrote:
> > On Tue, 26 Jun 2012 16:17:07 +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > > + if (unlikely(flags & I2C_CLIENT_SCCB) && size != I2C_SMBUS_BYTE_DATA) {
> > > + dev_err(&adapter->dev,
> > > + "SCCB devices only support I2C_SMBUS_BYTE_DATA\n");
> > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > + }
> > > +
> >
> > I'm not sure if we really want this. If the SCCB protocol evolves,
> > we'll have to loosen the check. If a devices follows SCCB for byte data
> > transactions and I2C/SMBus for others, it won't work. Plus it slows
> > down the function a bit, to catch a developer error which would not
> > result in anything catastrophic anyway.
> >
> > I propose that we either drop the check completely (my preference) or
> > make it depend on DEBUG.
>
> I'm OK with dropping the check. Should I resubmit the patch or can you modify
> it when applying ?
I'll do it myself, no problem.
Thanks,
--
Jean Delvare
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
