On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 11:01 AM, Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfal...@ti.com> wrote:
> When configuring pinmux with pinctrl-single there could be a case when one > register is used to configure mux for more than one pin. > In this case the use of pinctrl-single,pins is a bit problematic since we can > only update the whole register (restricted by the mask). > In such a situations the pinctrl-single,bits could provide a safe way to > handle > the mux. > > pinctrl-single,bits takes three parameters: <reg offset, value, sub-mask> > The sub mask is used to mask part of the register to make sure we do not > change > bits outside of the scope of this pin. > > The first patch in this series is to fix the previous pinctrl-since,pins > implementation because it was not using the mask on the value which could > result > changed bits outside of the mask. This looks sane to me, but I'd like Tony to ACK before I apply it. Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
