Ho Tony, On Friday 19 October 2012 09:17:43 Tony Lindgren wrote: > * Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinch...@ideasonboard.com> [121019 02:45]: > > On Thursday 18 October 2012 13:28:48 Tony Lindgren wrote: > > > @@ -117,13 +112,6 @@ static inline struct omap_iommu > > > *dev_to_omap_iommu(struct device *dev) } > > > > > > #endif > > > > > > -/* IOMMU errors */ > > > -#define OMAP_IOMMU_ERR_TLB_MISS (1 << 0) > > > -#define OMAP_IOMMU_ERR_TRANS_FAULT (1 << 1) > > > -#define OMAP_IOMMU_ERR_EMU_MISS (1 << 2) > > > -#define OMAP_IOMMU_ERR_TBLWALK_FAULT (1 << 3) > > > -#define OMAP_IOMMU_ERR_MULTIHIT_FAULT (1 << 4) > > > - > > > > I'll use those in the tidspbridge driver, in patches that I plan to push > > soon. > > > > I will apply this patch set on top of mine, see what breaks. Would you > > like me to propose a modified version of this set, or add additional > > patches in my set ? > > Sure, let's try to expose only the minimal amount of omap iommu things with > this patch set so we don't break things. Then the iommu development can > continue on it's own independent of the core omap code except for the > platform data.
I'll rebase my DSP patches on top of this patch set then, it will be easier. > But again, if there are nasty layering violations using this code, I would > just remove those features. Those things tend to just get worse unless they > are fixed properly to start with. The long-term goal is to move the tidspbridge driver to the IOMMU API, but we'll need a step by step approach. -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
