On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 22:29:36, Cousson, Benoit wrote: > + Mark > > On 11/05/2012 10:42 AM, AnilKumar Ch wrote: > > From: Colin Foe-Parker <colin.foepar...@logicpd.com> > > > > Set tps65217 PMIC status to OFF if power enable toggle is > > supported. Also adds platform data flag, which should be > > passed from board init data. > > > > Signed-off-by: Colin Foe-Parker <colin.foepar...@logicpd.com> > > [anilku...@ti.com: move the additions to tps65217 MFD driver] > > Signed-off-by: AnilKumar Ch <anilku...@ti.com> > > --- > > .../devicetree/bindings/regulator/tps65217.txt | 4 ++++ > > drivers/mfd/tps65217.c | 12 ++++++++++++ > > 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/tps65217.txt > > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/tps65217.txt > > index d316fb8..4f05d20 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/tps65217.txt > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/tps65217.txt > > @@ -11,6 +11,9 @@ Required properties: > > using the standard binding for regulators found at > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/regulator.txt. > > > > +Optional properties: > > +- ti,pmic-shutdown-controller: Telling the PMIC to shutdown on PWR_EN > > toggle. > > That sounds like a generic functionality to me. Don't we have some more > generic way to handle that?
But STATUS_OFF should be set only if Board supports it, otherwise this change doesn't make sense. > > If not, that should probably not be a TI only attribute. > > It looks like a GPIO like kind of interface at PMIC level. I agree this should be a generic parameter, but in some regulators this STATUS OFF control might not be available. This is in my mind while name this parameter. Thanks AnilKumar -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
