On 11/08/2012 11:38 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote: > * Jon Hunter <jon-hun...@ti.com> [121108 09:21]: >> >> On 11/07/2012 05:44 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote: >> >> That's a bugger. I completely missed your patch last week sorry (I will >> blame the Danish >> beer) and had clearly not folded in to my testing! > > :) > >>> I guess we should apply the following fix somewhere or >>> do we need to check other places too? >> >> I will re-test your master branch today and put it through my dmtimer tests >> to double check. >> However, in general I did ensure that we checked pdata was not NULL before >> accessing when >> I introduced the dt stuff. In my changelog [1] I had ... >> >> "5. When device-tree is present the platform_data structure will be NULL and >> so check for >> this." >> >> I just need to make sure that get_context_loss_count() is not called before >> checking it is >> populated. > > OK > > >>> + >>> + if (pdata) { >>> + timer->capability = pdata->timer_capability; >> >> You don't need this it is already handled a few lines before. >> >>> + timer->get_context_loss_count = pdata->get_context_loss_count; >> >> We could probably move this too. For example ... > > OK yeah makes sense to me. > > Regards, > > Tony > >> diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-omap/dmtimer.c b/arch/arm/plat-omap/dmtimer.c >> index 38c12ef..9dca23e 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm/plat-omap/dmtimer.c >> +++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/dmtimer.c >> @@ -799,12 +799,11 @@ static int __devinit omap_dm_timer_probe(struct >> platform_device *pdev) >> timer->id = pdev->id; >> timer->capability = pdata->timer_capability; >> timer->reserved = omap_dm_timer_reserved_systimer(timer->id); >> + timer->get_context_loss_count = >> pdata->get_context_loss_count; >> } >> >> timer->irq = irq->start; >> timer->pdev = pdev; >> - timer->capability = pdata->timer_capability; >> - timer->get_context_loss_count = pdata->get_context_loss_count; >> >> /* Skip pm_runtime_enable for OMAP1 */ >> if (!(timer->capability & OMAP_TIMER_NEEDS_RESET)) {
I have tested the dmtimers with this on the 3430-beagle and 4430-panda with and without device tree and is working fine. Do you want to generate the patch or me? Cheers Jon >> [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-omap&m=135065877008624&w=2 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html