On 11/08/2012 11:38 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Jon Hunter <jon-hun...@ti.com> [121108 09:21]:
>>
>> On 11/07/2012 05:44 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>>
>> That's a bugger. I completely missed your patch last week sorry (I will 
>> blame the Danish
>> beer) and had clearly not folded in to my testing!
> 
> :)
>  
>>> I guess we should apply the following fix somewhere or
>>> do we need to check other places too?
>>
>> I will re-test your master branch today and put it through my dmtimer tests 
>> to double check.
>> However, in general I did ensure that we checked pdata was not NULL before 
>> accessing when 
>> I introduced the dt stuff. In my changelog [1] I had ...
>>
>> "5. When device-tree is present the platform_data structure will be NULL and 
>> so check for
>> this."
>>
>> I just need to make sure that get_context_loss_count() is not called before 
>> checking it is
>> populated.  
> 
> OK
> 
>   
>>> +
>>> +   if (pdata) {
>>> +           timer->capability = pdata->timer_capability;
>>
>> You don't need this it is already handled a few lines before.
>>
>>> +           timer->get_context_loss_count = pdata->get_context_loss_count;
>>
>> We could probably move this too. For example ...
> 
> OK yeah makes sense to me.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Tony
>  
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-omap/dmtimer.c b/arch/arm/plat-omap/dmtimer.c
>> index 38c12ef..9dca23e 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/plat-omap/dmtimer.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/dmtimer.c
>> @@ -799,12 +799,11 @@ static int __devinit omap_dm_timer_probe(struct 
>> platform_device *pdev)
>>                 timer->id = pdev->id;
>>                 timer->capability = pdata->timer_capability;
>>                 timer->reserved = omap_dm_timer_reserved_systimer(timer->id);
>> +               timer->get_context_loss_count = 
>> pdata->get_context_loss_count;
>>         }
>>  
>>         timer->irq = irq->start;
>>         timer->pdev = pdev;
>> -       timer->capability = pdata->timer_capability;
>> -       timer->get_context_loss_count = pdata->get_context_loss_count;
>>  
>>         /* Skip pm_runtime_enable for OMAP1 */
>>         if (!(timer->capability & OMAP_TIMER_NEEDS_RESET)) {

I have tested the dmtimers with this on the 3430-beagle and 4430-panda
with and without device tree and is working fine.

Do you want to generate the patch or me?

Cheers
Jon

>> [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-omap&m=135065877008624&w=2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to