Hi,
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 02:10:50PM +0200, Roger Quadros wrote:
> > in fact, I would convert this construct into a switch which would look
> > like:
> >
> > reg &= ~(OMAP4_P1_MODE_MASK << i * 2);
> >
> > switch (port_mode[i]) {
> > case OMAP4_P1_MODE_TLL:
> > reg |= OMAP4_P1_MODE_TLL << i * 2;
> > break;
> > case OMAP_P1_MODE_HSIC:
> > reg |= OMAP4_P1_MODE_HSIC << i * 2;
> > break;
> > }
> >
>
> Just realized that is_ohci_port() takes care of 10 cases, so I'll leave
> it the way it was with if statement.fair enough. > > Also, it looks like the whoel for loop with port mode settings could be > > re-factored to a separate function to aid readability. > > > > it seems that the purpose of omap_usbhs_init() is to initialize > HOSTCONFIG so I see no point in adding another function for it. I can > clean it up for better readability though. when functions get too big, it starts to become a little difficult to see bugs. Re-factoring parts of a bigger function, into smaller functions helps with that as long as the new functions are self-contained and logical. At the end of the day, GCC will inline the new smaller functions anyway. cheers -- balbi
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
