Hi,

On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 06:02:09PM +0530, Hebbar Gururaja wrote:
> From: "Hebbar, Gururaja" <gururaja.heb...@ti.com>
> 
> omap4_cminst_wait_module_ready() checks if register offset is NULL.
> 
> int omap4_cminst_wait_module_ready(u8 part, u16 inst, s16 cdoffs,
>                                  u16 clkctrl_offs)
> {
>       int i = 0;
> 
>       if (!clkctrl_offs)
>               return 0;
> 
> In case of AM33xx, not all clock domains have CLKSTCTRL at 0x00. An
> example of this would be the RTC clock domain. In such cases the
> module ready check is skipped which leads to a data abort during bootup
> when RTC registers is accessed.
> 
> Since the actual base address is verified in
> omap4_cminst_read_inst_reg(), this check here is not required at all
> and hence can be removed.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Hebbar, Gururaja <gururaja.heb...@ti.com>
> ---
> :100644 100644 7f9a464... 40545ff... M        arch/arm/mach-omap2/cminst44xx.c
>  arch/arm/mach-omap2/cminst44xx.c |    3 ---
>  1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/cminst44xx.c 
> b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/cminst44xx.c
> index 7f9a464..40545ff 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/cminst44xx.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/cminst44xx.c
> @@ -271,9 +271,6 @@ int omap4_cminst_wait_module_ready(u8 part, u16 inst, s16 
> cdoffs,
>  {
>       int i = 0;
>  
> -     if (!clkctrl_offs)
> -             return 0;

looks like commit log has the wrong argument. I believe you meant to say
that AM33xx has CLKSTCTRL exactly at 0x00 and that's why this check has
to be removed. No ?

-- 
balbi

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to