Hi Felipe,
On Thursday 18 April 2013 09:28 AM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
Hi,

On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 05:04:24PM +0530, Sourav Poddar wrote:
@@ -1632,6 +1650,8 @@ static const struct dev_pm_ops serial_omap_dev_pm_ops = {
        SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(serial_omap_suspend, serial_omap_resume)
        SET_RUNTIME_PM_OPS(serial_omap_runtime_suspend,
                                serial_omap_runtime_resume, NULL)
+       .prepare        = serial_omap_prepare,
+       .complete       = serial_omap_complete,
if CONFIG_PM_SLEEP isn't defined, this will break compilation.

True.

Then, will it not be a better idea to add a similar macro[1] in include/linux/pm.h for
prepare/complete callback as it is present for suspend/resume ?.

[1]:
#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
#define SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(suspend_fn, resume_fn) \
        .suspend = suspend_fn, \
        .resume = resume_fn, \
        .freeze = suspend_fn, \
        .thaw = resume_fn, \
        .poweroff = suspend_fn, \
        .restore = resume_fn,
#else
#define SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(suspend_fn, resume_fn)
#endif



~Sourav

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to