On 06/18/2013 04:03 AM, J Keerthy wrote:
> The SMPS10 regulator is not presesnt in all the variants
> of the PALMAS PMIC family. Hence adding a feature to distingush
> between them.

> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/palmas.c b/drivers/mfd/palmas.c

> +     match = of_match_device(of_match_ptr(of_palmas_match_tbl), &i2c->dev);
> +
> +     if (match) {
> +             features = (unsigned int *)match->data;
> +             palmas->features = *features;
> +     } else {
> +             return -ENODATA;
> +     }


I think it's more common to do the error-checking first. That way, the
success-case code doesn't need an indent:

match = of_match...(...);
if (!match)
    return -ENODATA;

features = ...;
palmas->features = *features;

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to