On Friday 21 June 2013, Anna, Suman wrote:
> Yes, we still have a plan for a generic subsystem, and these would form the
> the base patches of OMAP adaptation towards that. OMAP mailbox was disabled
> since couple of releases now because of the multi-platform enablement. There
> were
> couple of different work-items needed on OMAP mailbox like fixing the
> multi-platform,
> converting to DT and adapting to the new framework. The previous subsystem was
> derived of the OMAP mailbox, so the first and last items were kinda
> automatic. The
> newest one based on Jassi's work is not gonna reuse any OMAP stuff, so this
> series
> handles the first one to avoid a huge pending patchset for OMAP on the generic
> framework finalization.
Ok, thanks for the explanation. Please also see the other email thread
about the linux-next conflict.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
