On 07/16/2013 03:05 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> We want to have static pin states handled separately from
> dynamic pin states, so let's add optional state_active.
>
> Then if state_active is defined, let's check and make sure
> state_idle and state_sleep match state_active for the
> pin groups to avoid checking them during runtime as the
> active and idle pins may need to be toggled for many
> devices every time we enter and exit idle.
> + * Note that if active state is defined, sleep and idle states must
> + * cover the same pin groups as active state.
> */
> dev->pins->sleep_state = pinctrl_lookup_state(dev->pins->p,
> PINCTRL_STATE_SLEEP);
> - if (IS_ERR(dev->pins->sleep_state))
> + if (IS_ERR(dev->pins->sleep_state)) {
> /* Not supplying this state is perfectly legal */
> dev_dbg(dev, "no sleep pinctrl state\n");
> + } else if (!IS_ERR(dev->pins->active_state)) {
> + ret = pinctrl_check_dynamic(dev, dev->pins->active_state,
> + dev->pins->sleep_state);
Oh, I see you're trying to check that the set of pins in the active,
sleep, and idle states are identical.
But I think that pinctrl_check_dynamic() only checks that one state is a
subset of the other, not that the two states are equal. Instead, I think
you want to comparison coded in pinctrl_check_dynamic() to be:
gen_group_list_of_pinctrl_state(s1, array1);
gen_group_list_of_pinctrl_state(s2, array2);
mismatch = memcmp(array1, array2, length);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
