Hi,
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 07:09:57PM +0300, Illia Smyrnov wrote:
> Convert to use threaded IRQ.
>
> Cc: Felipe Balbi <ba...@ti.com>
> Signed-off-by: Illia Smyrnov <illia.smyr...@ti.com>
> ---
> drivers/input/keyboard/omap4-keypad.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++---------
> 1 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/input/keyboard/omap4-keypad.c
> b/drivers/input/keyboard/omap4-keypad.c
> index c727548..b876a0d 100644
> --- a/drivers/input/keyboard/omap4-keypad.c
> +++ b/drivers/input/keyboard/omap4-keypad.c
> @@ -112,8 +112,22 @@ static void kbd_write_irqreg(struct omap4_keypad
> *keypad_data,
> }
>
>
> -/* Interrupt handler */
> -static irqreturn_t omap4_keypad_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
> +/* Interrupt handlers */
> +static irqreturn_t omap4_keypad_irq_handler(int irq, void *dev_id)
> +{
> + struct omap4_keypad *keypad_data = dev_id;
> +
> + if (kbd_read_irqreg(keypad_data, OMAP4_KBD_IRQSTATUS)) {
> + /* Disable interrupts */
> + kbd_write_irqreg(keypad_data, OMAP4_KBD_IRQENABLE,
> + OMAP4_VAL_IRQDISABLE);
> + return IRQ_WAKE_THREAD;
> + }
> +
> + return IRQ_NONE;
> +}
> +
> +static irqreturn_t omap4_keypad_irq_thread_fn(int irq, void *dev_id)
> {
> struct omap4_keypad *keypad_data = dev_id;
> struct input_dev *input_dev = keypad_data->input;
> @@ -121,10 +135,6 @@ static irqreturn_t omap4_keypad_interrupt(int irq, void
> *dev_id)
> unsigned int col, row, code, changed;
> u32 *new_state = (u32 *) key_state;
>
> - /* Disable interrupts */
> - kbd_write_irqreg(keypad_data, OMAP4_KBD_IRQENABLE,
> - OMAP4_VAL_IRQDISABLE);looking a lot better, but I wonder if you should add a mutex to this threaded handler, but I guess there's no way this will never race since IRQs are masked anyway and registers are only accessed from within IRQ handlers. Reviewed-by: Felipe Balbi <ba...@ti.com> -- balbi
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
