Hi
On Tue, 23 Jul 2013, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
> With support to parse clock data from DT, move all main and optional
> clock information from hwmod to DT.
>
> We still retain clocks in hwmod for devices which do not have a DT node.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rajendra Nayak <rna...@ti.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/boot/dts/omap4.dtsi | 100 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_44xx_data.c | 112
> ----------------------------
> 2 files changed, 100 insertions(+), 112 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap4.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap4.dtsi
> index 8e142f9..4dddf64 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap4.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap4.dtsi
> @@ -106,6 +106,8 @@
> compatible = "ti,omap-counter32k";
> reg = <0x4a304000 0x20>;
> ti,hwmods = "counter_32k";
> + clocks = <&sys_32k_ck>;
> + clock-names = "fck";
Shouldn't these patches be using the official DT clock binding format?
Either the 'clocks' property should be something like:
clocks = <&prm 10>;
or a change to the bindings needs to be discussed and implemented.
- Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
