Hi On Tue, 23 Jul 2013, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
> With support to parse clock data from DT, move all main and optional > clock information from hwmod to DT. > > We still retain clocks in hwmod for devices which do not have a DT node. > > Signed-off-by: Rajendra Nayak <rna...@ti.com> > --- > arch/arm/boot/dts/omap4.dtsi | 100 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ > arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_44xx_data.c | 112 > ---------------------------- > 2 files changed, 100 insertions(+), 112 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap4.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap4.dtsi > index 8e142f9..4dddf64 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap4.dtsi > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap4.dtsi > @@ -106,6 +106,8 @@ > compatible = "ti,omap-counter32k"; > reg = <0x4a304000 0x20>; > ti,hwmods = "counter_32k"; > + clocks = <&sys_32k_ck>; > + clock-names = "fck"; Shouldn't these patches be using the official DT clock binding format? Either the 'clocks' property should be something like: clocks = <&prm 10>; or a change to the bindings needs to be discussed and implemented. - Paul -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html