Hi Benoit, On Tuesday 20 August 2013 02:48 PM, Benoit Cousson wrote:
> Otherwise, I guess that most of these patches should be non-intrusive > for other OMAPs beside that one (ARM: OMAP2+: CM: reintroduce SW_SLEEP > for OMAP4). And for the moment, that's maybe the most important point. > > Have you checked that it will not generate any regression for OMAP4 in > term of PM features: suspend, cpuidle at least? As noted by Rajendra, there could problem where clockdomain doesn't have SW_SLEEP and only have HW_AUTO. I have to rework the relevant patch to handle it properly. Regards Afzal -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
