Hi,

On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 05:08:30PM -0600, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_device.c 
> b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_device.c
> index b69dd9a..f97b34b 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_device.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_device.c
> @@ -621,6 +621,7 @@ static int _od_suspend_noirq(struct device *dev)
>  
>       if (!ret && !pm_runtime_status_suspended(dev)) {
>               if (pm_generic_runtime_suspend(dev) == 0) {
> +                     pm_runtime_set_suspended(dev);

don't you have to disable pm_runtime around status changes ? Or is
pm_runtime already disabled by the time we get here ?

> @@ -634,10 +635,10 @@ static int _od_resume_noirq(struct device *dev)
>       struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(dev);
>       struct omap_device *od = to_omap_device(pdev);
>  
> -     if ((od->flags & OMAP_DEVICE_SUSPENDED) &&
> -         !pm_runtime_status_suspended(dev)) {
> +     if (od->flags & OMAP_DEVICE_SUSPENDED) {
>               od->flags &= ~OMAP_DEVICE_SUSPENDED;
>               omap_device_enable(pdev);
> +             pm_runtime_set_active(dev);

ditto, also pm_runtime_set_active() may fail.

-- 
balbi

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to