* Javier Martinez Canillas <[email protected]> [131116 07:36]:
> Hi Tony,
>
> On 11/16/2013 03:18 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > * Javier Martinez Canillas <[email protected]> [131116 05:25]:
> >> On Device Tree boot the VDDS_DSI regulator is not linked to
> >> the DPI device so omapfb driver probing fails with:
> >>
> >> [ 3.186035] OMAPFB: omapfb_probe
> >> [ 3.190704] omapdss DPI error: can't get VDDS_DSI regulator
> >> [ 3.196594] omapfb omapfb: failed to connect default display
> >> [ 3.202667] omapfb omapfb: failed to init overlay connections
> >> [ 3.208892] OMAPFB: free_resources
> >> [ 3.212493] OMAPFB: free all fbmem
> >> [ 3.216735] omapfb omapfb: failed to setup omapfb
> >>
> >> As a workaround try to use the VPLL2 regulator from twl4030 in
> >> dpi_init_regulator() if getting the VDDS_DSI regulator fails.
> >
> > Probably makes sens to fix this in the dpi.c, but this can also be set
> > in the .dts file. I just set up the following in the omap3-ldp.dts file:
> >
>
> Sorry is not clear to me if you agree that makes sense to do this fix on dpi.c
> or if you think this is a bad idea and prefer to do it in the DTS instead?
>
> I'm asking to know if I have to send a follow up patch or not :)
Well let's see what Tomi prefers.
> > &vaux1 {
> > /* Needed for ads7846 */
> > regulator-name = "vcc";
> > };
> >
> > &vpll2 {
> > /* Needed for DSS */
> > regulator-name = "vdds_dsi";
> > };
In the long we'll use regulator phandles anyways in the DSS related
nodes, so from that point of view fixing dpi.c makes sense.
Regards,
Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
