On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 08:01:19PM +0400, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote: > Check if we really have Scoop config, otherwice we can get a nice Oops > during probe.
Looks to me like -rc material. Please submit to the patch tracker with your (missing) sign-off. Thanks. > --- > drivers/pcmcia/pxa2xx_sharpsl.c | 3 +++ > 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/pcmcia/pxa2xx_sharpsl.c b/drivers/pcmcia/pxa2xx_sharpsl.c > index 1cd02f5..bc43f78 100644 > --- a/drivers/pcmcia/pxa2xx_sharpsl.c > +++ b/drivers/pcmcia/pxa2xx_sharpsl.c > @@ -255,6 +255,9 @@ static int __init sharpsl_pcmcia_init(void) > { > int ret; > > + if (!platform_scoop_config) > + return -ENODEV; > + > sharpsl_pcmcia_ops.nr = platform_scoop_config->num_devs; > sharpsl_pcmcia_device = platform_device_alloc("pxa2xx-pcmcia", -1); > > -- > 1.6.2.1 > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > List admin: http://lists.arm.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel > FAQ: http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/mailinglists/faq.php > Etiquette: http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/mailinglists/etiquette.php _______________________________________________ Linux PCMCIA reimplementation list http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pcmcia