Hi Dominik,
here is a fix for the rule to prevent PCMCIA_DEV_ID_MATCH_FUNC_ID entries
to match on PFC-cards. e.g. serial_cs PCMCIA_DEVICE_FUNC_ID(2)
will match on device 0 of a xircom CEM33 card resulting in a
failure in xirc2ps_cs.
I changed the code, so that the first matching struct pcmcia_device_id
_PFC_ entry will mark the card has_pfc, preventing
PCMCIA_DEV_ID_MATCH_FUNC_ID to match.
Cheers, Alexander
>From adea8dbc5de871f72572bb0ae5158e91051f6ed5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alexander Kurz <li...@kbdbabel.org>
Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2010 09:49:43 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] pcmcia: fix matching rules for pseudo-multi-function cards,
prevent PCMCIA_DEV_ID_MATCH_FUNC_ID from grabbing PFC-cards.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kurz <li...@kbdbabel.org>
CC: linux-pcmcia@lists.infradead.org
---
drivers/pcmcia/ds.c | 7 ++++---
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pcmcia/ds.c b/drivers/pcmcia/ds.c
index 4014cf8..6ae35b3 100644
--- a/drivers/pcmcia/ds.c
+++ b/drivers/pcmcia/ds.c
@@ -828,11 +828,12 @@ static inline int pcmcia_devmatch(struct pcmcia_device
*dev,
}
if (did->match_flags & PCMCIA_DEV_ID_MATCH_DEVICE_NO) {
- if (dev->device_no != did->device_no)
- return 0;
+ dev_dbg(&dev->dev, "this is a pseudo-multi-function device\n");
mutex_lock(&dev->socket->ops_mutex);
dev->socket->pcmcia_state.has_pfc = 1;
mutex_unlock(&dev->socket->ops_mutex);
+ if (dev->device_no != did->device_no)
+ return 0;
}
if (did->match_flags & PCMCIA_DEV_ID_MATCH_FUNC_ID) {
@@ -843,7 +844,7 @@ static inline int pcmcia_devmatch(struct pcmcia_device *dev,
/* if this is a pseudo-multi-function device,
* we need explicit matches */
- if (did->match_flags & PCMCIA_DEV_ID_MATCH_DEVICE_NO)
+ if (dev->socket->pcmcia_state.has_pfc)
return 0;
if (dev->device_no)
return 0;
--
1.7.0
_______________________________________________
Linux PCMCIA reimplementation list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pcmcia
