Hi, > http://userweb.kernel.org/~brodo/pcmcia-2.6.35.diff
Serial part of Xircom card works with pcmcia-2.6.35.diff. ----- Original Message ----- >Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2010 15:32:12 +0200 >From: Dominik Brodowski <li...@dominikbrodowski.net> >To: Komuro <komurojun-...@nifty.com>, pa...@ucw.cz >Cc: linux-pcmcia@lists.infradead.org >Subject: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [PATCH 11/18] pcmcia: do not > use io_req_t when calling pcmcia_request_io() > > >Hey, > >On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 09:50:31PM +0900, Komuro wrote: >> >Also on re-inserting the card (with 2.6.36-rc4+ as of today)? >> >> I tried the 2.6.36-rc4-git4. > >Thanks for testing! > >> >elese we wouldn't see the "is a 16550A" message, right? >> >> Even if the COR(Configuration Option Register) of irq is not properly setup , >> we can see the above message... > >Nothing relating to setting CISREG_COR (at least on pcnet_cs) changed, and >serial_cs does not modify CISREG_COR on such pseudo-multifunction devices. > >Would it be possible for you to re-check plain 2.6.35 and 2.6.35 with the >pcmcia patchset availble at > http://userweb.kernel.org/~brodo/pcmcia-2.6.35.diff >? > >If this works, we know that it's a serial/tty core issue, else it's indeed a >PCMCIA issue. > >Pavel: has the bt / pcmcia issue you were seeing with -rc1 been solved? If >not, could you try out 2.6.35 with this bigdiff as well, please? > >Thanks & best, > Dominik _______________________________________________ Linux PCMCIA reimplementation list http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pcmcia