Power is actually reported in wall draw.  This includes drives, power supply 
inefficiencies, etc.  In the case of a blade system, the power is measured at 
the blade but is converted to wall draw.  It includes all devices on the blade, 
but does not include any chassis infrastructure such as fans, IO modules, 
Chassis management controller, etc.  The Chassis management controller also 
reports power consumption.  This also is reported in the context of wall draw.  
Since it monitors the entire chassis, this number includes fans, blades, CMCs, 
IO modules, power supply inefficiencies, etc.  I will respond to some of the 
other issues raised by John Lloyd separately when I have time to verify a few 
items.

Wayne Weilnau
Systems Management Technologist
Dell | OpenManage Software Development 

Please consider the environment before printing this email.

Confidentiality Notice | This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for 
the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential or 
proprietary information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or 
distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, immediately 
contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original 
message.

-----Original Message-----
From: linux-poweredge-bounces-Lists On Behalf Of Andrew Sharp
Sent: Monday, April 05, 2010 2:08 PM
To: linux-poweredge-Lists
Subject: Re:


> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 4
> Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2010 11:55:21 -0500
> From: Matt Domsch <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: Power consumption -- real vs actual
> To: John LLOYD <[email protected]>
> Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> 
> On Mon, Apr 05, 2010 at 09:37:45AM -0700, John LLOYD wrote:
> > FYI, commands were
> >  CPU heater:  dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/null  &    8 to 16 times
> 
> That's not a terribly good CPU-intensive load.  Try something like
> this a few times in parallel
> 
> pi=$(echo "scale=100000; 4*a(1)" | bc -l)  &
> 
> I can feel the space under my desk heating up after just a few seconds
> of this...

Heh.  Also, a good cpu heater is compiling a kernel with a -j option
of about (NCPUS * 1.5), so -j6 for a single quad core.

Power is a relatively simple calculation.  The PSU is rated for more
than the maximum, just in case.  That PSU rating is the max that PSU is
capable of putting out, not what it draws at idle or anything like that.
110V * 7A = 770watts, which is the maximum your power cord (?) or other
power infrastructure leading to the server can handle, which is less
than the max the PSU can handle.  So far, so good.

The power draw measurements reported by the management tools, I assume
is the reading from the power sensor on the motherboard.  This will be
quite a bit less than the actual power draw of the server at the wall
socket, because it doesn't account for power usage by disk drives or
other devices connected directly to the PSU.  Unless that sensor is
actually in the PSU. Regardless, it also won't account for the power
loss of the PSU itself, so the only way to accurately know what is the
power draw your infrastructure is experiencing, is to use a power
(watt) meter at the "wall socket" or use an amp meter and voltage
meter, also at the "wall socket."

Hope that helps ~:^)

Cheers,

a

_______________________________________________
Linux-PowerEdge mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.us.dell.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-poweredge
Please read the FAQ at http://lists.us.dell.com/faq

_______________________________________________
Linux-PowerEdge mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.us.dell.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-poweredge
Please read the FAQ at http://lists.us.dell.com/faq

Reply via email to